Here's the actually testing rubric used to grade the students:
Deck Size: 10 - the testee uses 40 cards in your deck
Dueling Style: 4 - uses a style half retracted, often taking to counteract or to modify your style
Attitude: 4 - sometimes took longer than necessary to take action, even though I often depend on just 3 or 4 cards, but has a single thought (still do not understand this mind)
Field Control: 7 - in the first duel dominate the field left me almost completely, but that, despite not change his style, sought to dominate a little more in the second duel
Siding Skills: 8 - siding is something difficult to assess, but did a good siding, because it showed that there were cards used in the first duel, which makes me believe that the deck is mounted well structured way to adapt to different situations
Originality: 6 - E-hero is not something original, because many use, despite using some different monsters, the base is always the same
Misplays: 5 - Without missplays (is that I had a missplay)
Knowledge Of Rulings: 6 - lacked knowledge about some rules such as fusion summon some monsters (monsters that require that they be used only x and y monsters and nothing more) and also of letters as safe zone
Skill With Deck: 5 - in many instances lacked skills with the deck, with moments of shows have great skills, through unstable times
Control Of Duel: 7 - in many instances failed to take control of the duel, interspersed with moments of great control, managed better in the second duel duel
Quickness Of Deck: 7 - E-hero is a good deck, but sometimes is not fast enough, but it goes back to know he had a speed more
Deck Style: 7 - despite a well-known type of deck, added another style to it, making it work as per your wish, adding letters not normally used in such decks.
Total: 76 /100
Cyber Dragon: 70-
Cyber Twin: 71-95
Cyber End: 96-100
Welcome to Cyber Twin Dorm, enjoy your stay, learn more and more, improve your skills and keep active.
Thanks for the duel